This restaurant chain presents the worst bang on your buck, prospects say

Date:


In terms of eating out, prospects say Shake Shack
SHAK,
-0.11%
has gotten far too dear for what it’s meting out. And that’s even supposing it’s even not the most costly of the fast-casual and fast-food restaurant chains.

That’s the massive takeaway from a brand new research by Stifel
SF,
+1.14%,
the wealth-management and investment-banking agency. The report checked out menu pricing at a number of widespread chains, and it additionally checked out how prospects rated these eating places when it comes to worth — and highlighted which of them left them hungry for extra.

So, what’s the most costly chain, primarily based on the typical value of a well-liked meal throughout 20 cities? It’s Panera Bread, with a value of $14.76. Shake Shack got here in fourth, with a value of $13.50. The others in prime 5 had been Chipotle
CMG,
-3.01%
at $14.34, Blaze Pizza at $13.72 and Jersey Mike’s at $13.23.

Then the 1,280 survey respondents had been requested, “Which restaurant(s) do you consider have grow to be too costly for what you get?” Shake Shack topped the record by a large margin.

Stifel assigned Shake Shack a numerical score of 97 primarily based on the survey responses, indicating a excessive dissatisfaction in what is perhaps referred to as the bang-for-your-buck division. The score weighed the variety of responses in relation to the variety of eating places the chain has within the U.S.

In terms of how customers really feel a few restaurant chain, it’s not all about value.

Rounding out the highest 5 eating places that diners mentioned have grow to be too costly for what you get had been Blaze Pizza, with a score of 48; MOD Pizza, with at score of 31; Panera Bread, with a score of 29; and Chick-fil-A, with a score of 16.

On the flip aspect, customers appeared to just accept the worth supplied at chains similar to McDonald’s
MCD,
-1.16%
and Taco Bell
YUM,
-1.43%,
each of which had a score of 4.

The Stifel research had its limitations in that it didn’t think about each fast-casual or fast-food chain within the nation. The research famous that 5 Guys, for instance, was much more costly than Panera, with a mean meal value of $16.33. However 5 Guys wasn’t included within the bang-for-your-buck survey, so client satisfaction with the chain isn’t mirrored within the report.

For Stifel managing director Chris O’Cull, the research clearly illustrates that it’s not all about value with regards to how customers really feel about restaurant chains.

“Some are perceived as too costly regardless of their meal costs being decrease,” O’Cull mentioned.

MarketWatch reached out to a variety of restaurant chains for remark in regards to the Stifel report, however not all responded instantly.

Chipotle chief monetary officer Jack Hartung did reply. In a press release, he pointed to the model’s worth proposition, noting that the typical value of the chain’s rooster burrito is beneath $9, inserting Chipotle “nicely under our fast-casual friends.” (The Stifel survey seemed on the pricing for an entire meal.)

As for Shake Shack, a consultant referred to the next assertion from a current firm earnings report: “In menu innovation, we proceed to prepared the ground with dynamic and enjoyable merchandise, offering our friends with elevated, premium, high-quality elements that they will’t discover in conventional quick meals, different quick informal ideas and even informal eating. A Shack burger, fries and beverage is on common beneath $14, nicely inside and sometimes priced under the price of different lunch or dinner choices close by.”


LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

The Trump arrest saga in 70 seconds

Donald Trump shall be charged with against the...

Nic Cage Vampire Film Is a Bloody Good Time

Completely dripping blood and camped out all week...